Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • For a solid object moving through a [[fluid]] or [[gas]], '''drag''' is the sum of all the [[aerodynamics|aerodynamic]] or [[hydrodynamics|hy ...the square of velocity. Thus, the resultant power needed to overcome this drag will vary as the cube of velocity.
    2 KB (254 words) - 22:48, 23 September 2009
  • ...a vehicle. The idea was to create vehicles with the lowest possible [[drag coefficient]]. The cars where named BAT for "[[Berlinetta]] Aerodinamica Tecnica." All The cars were successful in their goal, the best achieving a [[drag coefficient]] of 0.19, an achievement even by today's standards. For each of the cars,
    5 KB (854 words) - 13:00, 14 October 2009
  • * [[Automobile drag coefficient]]
    4 KB (534 words) - 19:22, 26 April 2010
  • ...perfecting its aerodynamics. With the top up, the California has a [[drag coefficient]] of 0.32, making it the most aerodynamic Ferrari ever made.
    4 KB (539 words) - 07:19, 14 October 2009
  • ...nbsp;sq ft) but the sharp nose and smooth curves mean it has a [[drag coefficient]] of only 0.34. ...oven themselves, giving the car greater downforce at the same time as less drag than the Enzo also making the car more stable than the Enzo at high speeds.
    10 KB (1,354 words) - 07:43, 17 April 2009
  • and [[Politecnico di Torino]], achieving a record low [[drag coefficient]] of 0.47.
    5 KB (616 words) - 23:40, 9 December 2011
  • ...ent. The design, by the [[I.DE.A Institute]], produced an excellent [[drag coefficient]] of only 0.29. The core of the product was prestige, exclusivity, personal
    6 KB (761 words) - 09:09, 9 December 2010
  • ...untach]], the new car was smaller, very aerodynamic (0.31 [[coefficient of drag|cd]]), and featured Gandini's trademark angular rear wheel arch.
    10 KB (1,438 words) - 13:01, 18 September 2009
  • ...ed 1979 debut. The styling was not particularly aerodynamic but the [[drag coefficient]] was a somewhat respectable 0.41. Power came from an all-new 2.5 V6 engin
    6 KB (797 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2009
  • ...the rear and front of the car. This is intended to achieve minimal [[drag coefficient]] and maximal [[downforce]]. Air from the radiator is extracted through an ...erodynamic efficiency in a variety of driving conditions, where a low drag coefficient is not the determining factor. During braking, for example, the rear flaps
    17 KB (2,787 words) - 18:29, 10 March 2011
  • ...style only, a small, angular 3-door [[hatchback]], with a favorable [[drag coefficient]] of only 0.33 that bore similariies to the [[Lancia Y10]]. It featured sev
    7 KB (1,015 words) - 17:50, 31 October 2009
  • ...mpany, its tall, square body utilising a [[Kamm tail]] achieved a low drag coefficient of 0.34 won it much praise for airy interior space and [[Fuel economy in au ...ated bodywork at the nose and a different tailgate, that improved the drag coefficient to Cd 0.30, and matched the corporate look of the then new Fiat Tipo.
    14 KB (2,085 words) - 22:13, 31 October 2009
  • ...y kit improve performance, the majority add weight and increase the [[drag coefficient]] of the vehicle and thus reduce its overall performance.
    8 KB (1,297 words) - 19:20, 26 April 2010
  • ...been redesigned to be more curvaceous and aerodynamic. Although the drag coefficient remains the same, downforce has been greatly enhanced. A great deal of Fer
    8 KB (1,269 words) - 10:36, 15 March 2010
  • ...signed to provide maximum [[downforce]] with a minimum of [[Drag (physics)|drag]]; every part of the bodywork is designed with this aim in mind. Like most ...ocity. The aerodynamics are adjusted for each track; with a relatively low drag configuration for tracks where high speed is relatively more important like
    23 KB (3,769 words) - 14:04, 27 September 2009
  • ...br=on}} – an increase of 76% over the 599 GTB – and has a [[drag coefficient]] of 0.299.
    12 KB (1,797 words) - 12:37, 19 March 2017
  • ...rrowness and the slick styling meant that this version had the lowest drag coefficient of any Countach model and possibly the highest top speed.
    10 KB (1,490 words) - 21:50, 26 September 2009
  • ...rrowness and the slick styling meant that this version had the lowest drag coefficient of any Countach model and possibly the highest top speed.
    11 KB (1,621 words) - 21:02, 21 October 2009
  • ...often improves [[aerodynamic]] performance, resulting in a reduced [[drag coefficient]]. Examples of these cars are the [[Opel Vectra]], the [[Ford Mondeo]] and
    14 KB (2,215 words) - 08:19, 8 October 2009
  • ...designed by Italian design house [[I.DE.A Institute]]. A exceptional drag coefficient of 0.29 was achieved with the body design.
    13 KB (1,933 words) - 09:06, 22 October 2009

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)