Difference between revisions of "Body Frame Integral"
m |
m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
! Advantages | ! Advantages | ||
! Effects | ! Effects | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
! Disadvantages | ! Disadvantages | ||
! Effects | ! Effects | ||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
| Fewer parts and less weight | | Fewer parts and less weight | ||
| Better fuel efficiency | | Better fuel efficiency | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Difficult components to integrate | | Difficult components to integrate | ||
| Harder to assemble and repair | | Harder to assemble and repair | ||
| Line 24: | Line 20: | ||
| Lower center of Gravity | | Lower center of Gravity | ||
| Less likely to roll vehicle | | Less likely to roll vehicle | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Noise, Vibration, and Harshness increased | | Noise, Vibration, and Harshness increased | ||
| Customer satisfaction issue | | Customer satisfaction issue | ||
| Line 31: | Line 25: | ||
| Less drag | | Less drag | ||
| Better fuel efficiency | | Better fuel efficiency | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Passengers do not sit as high | | Passengers do not sit as high | ||
| Customer satisfaction issue | | Customer satisfaction issue | ||
| Line 38: | Line 30: | ||
| Better wheel clearance | | Better wheel clearance | ||
| Allows diverse selection | | Allows diverse selection | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Less durable than BOF; cab and bed need to be connected | | Less durable than BOF; cab and bed need to be connected | ||
| Most trucks not applicable for BFI | | Most trucks not applicable for BFI | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| + | * [[Frame (vehicle)]] | ||
* [[Body-on-frame]] | * [[Body-on-frame]] | ||
| − | * [[Monocoque]] | + | * [[Chassis]] |
| + | * [[Coachwork]] | ||
| + | * [[Monocoque]] | ||
| + | * [[Spaceframe]] | ||
| + | * [[Subframe]] | ||
| + | * [[Superleggera]] | ||
[[Category:Automotive technologies]] | [[Category:Automotive technologies]] | ||
Revision as of 20:01, 12 November 2008
Body frame integral (BFI) is a methodology for manufacturing within the automotive industry. It has become the main technique for chassis assembly for most vehicles except trucks and large sport utility vehicles, replacing the traditional approach of body-on-frame (BOF).
BOF utilizes an independent frame that is used to connect the suspension to the body frame. The main advantage of this is that soft mounts are used to reasonably isolate the body from the vibrations endured by both the frame and the suspension system. BFI was developed for the main purposes of reducing weight and drag, as well as lowering the center of gravity. Front end cradles are still used in BFI, which allows soft mounts to be implemented in the engine compartment. However, most rear ends are hard mounted, but technological advancements allow the associated effects of noise, vibration, and harshness to be suitably managed.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Advantages | Effects | Disadvantages | Effects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fewer parts and less weight | Better fuel efficiency | Difficult components to integrate | Harder to assemble and repair |
| Lower center of Gravity | Less likely to roll vehicle | Noise, Vibration, and Harshness increased | Customer satisfaction issue |
| Less drag | Better fuel efficiency | Passengers do not sit as high | Customer satisfaction issue |
| Better wheel clearance | Allows diverse selection | Less durable than BOF; cab and bed need to be connected | Most trucks not applicable for BFI |